To non-moguls, Elon Musk’s (maybe non permanent) rebrand of Twitter to “X” could appear excessive danger, amateurish, and even capricious.
However it’s probably doing precisely what he supposed: producing monumental international curiosity, pushing Twitter nearer to his different X manufacturers (SpaceX, Tesla Mannequin X, xAI), and clearing the way in which for a worthwhile merging of applied sciences.
What occurred to the blue chicken?
Final weekend, Musk started the (reversible) modifications by renaming the Twitter platform X on its web site and changing the iconic blue chicken emblem with a crowdsourced “interim” white “X” on a black background.
Later, Musk posted a picture of the character projected on the agency’s San Francisco headquarters and tweeted (or is that “X’d”?) that x.com now redirects to twitter.com.
The X bears a robust resemblance to the Unicode character “mathematical double-struck capital X”, derived from the way in which daring characters are often written on blackboards in maths lectures. The brand continues to be present process iterations, with a short-lived thickening of the traces going stay on July 26, earlier than Musk introduced he didn’t prefer it and would revert.
Our headquarters tonight pic.twitter.com/GO6yY8R7fO
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 24, 2023
Has a radical rebrand ever succeeded?
In 2021, Fb rebranded its holding firm to Meta. Nevertheless it stored “Fb”, gave us the metaverse, and didn’t deprive the world of a cute feathery icon and idea of “tweeting”.
Branding specialists across the globe have been fast to sentence the Twitter shakeup as too sudden and harmful of brand name capital. That’s maybe as a result of even slight title modifications are recognized to be dangerous. Kentucky Fried Rooster formally rebranded to KFC. Pepsi was as soon as Pepsi-Cola. These profitable changes took time and cautious administration.
Dramatic renaming of a family title has principally by no means labored. And there’s little question a black “X” changing “Twitter” is dramatic. It smashes the metaphor of birds updating each other in an idyllic blue-sky ecosystem. Sentimental followers holding out for a return to the great outdated days have now bought the memo: Twitter isn’t for you.
However maybe that’s the purpose. To me, X – a logo that may be a cattle marker or an illiterate signature – looks like a probe to perturb and take a look at the market.
Musk isn’t renaming quick meals or tender drinks. Twitter is within the hyper-dynamic enterprise of knowledge. Musk is agile and effectively armed. So perhaps new branding guidelines are being cast.
Musk’s progressive alienation of Twitter’s conventional customers could possibly be an try and refresh the platform’s demographic – to attract in these true to his different manufacturers, whereas shaking off unprofitable sceptics. This will surely match with the push X offers in the direction of Musk’s different X manufacturers.
Most commentators have latched onto the thought the change is sudden, irreversible, and full in sooner or later. However Musk’s previous enterprise endeavours counsel he’s a strategist. The change will take time to play out and might probably be revised, reversed and adjusted as suggestions is generated.
Doesn’t another person personal the “X” trademark?
Trademarking of “X” might be not pivotal to the Twitter rebrand. However attaining restricted possession of the letter isn’t as preposterous because it sounds.
Logos are granted or refused primarily based on their capacity to establish the supply of the related items or companies. This implies X can perform as a trademark if it clearly identifies Twitter within the minds of the general public (supplied one other Twitter-like service doesn’t at the moment maintain the trademark). Well-known manufacturers have benefits: Musk has already garnered sufficient media consideration to make sure X is now a globally recognised time period for his firm.
Is X a generic time period and thus not trademarkable? My very own analysis argues emblems utilized by tech corporations concerned in shopper search and resolution making (like Twitter) are inherently generic. However below the 77-year-old Lanham Act that also governs emblems in america, X must be a typical generic title for all companies like Twitter to be refused. It isn’t. It’s largely only a generic time period for the twenty fourth letter of the alphabet.
Hypothesis in regards to the legality of X as a trademark is one factor. My time writing about emblems, has taught me the truth in courts and tribunals is one other. Each Microsoft and Meta (and plenty of others) have laid claims to X prior to now for varied items and companies.
It seems Instagram and FB proprietor Meta holds the trademark for “X” because it pertains to “on-line social networking companies… social networking companies within the fields of leisure, gaming and software growth…” https://t.co/vb2r67ZOzb
— Alex Weprin (@alexweprin) July 24, 2023
Lawsuits over X could also be filed, however ultimate determinations could possibly be years within the courts. And if issues go badly, Musk has simply proven his willingness to pivot.
What’s Musk making an attempt to realize?
Tech commentators are intrigued by the thought the X rebrand is a part of Musk’s plan to create a WeChat-style “the whole lot app” that will converge messaging, search, on-line purchasing and cell fee. Twitter CEO, Yaccarino, has stated as a lot.
There’s completely no restrict to this transformation. X would be the platform that may ship, effectively….the whole lot. @elonmusk and I are wanting ahead to working with our groups and each single one among our companions to carry X to the world.
— Linda Yaccarino (@lindayacc) July 23, 2023
I discover that evaluation too simplistic, particularly given the continued give attention to antitrust. Musk is arguably able to survey (and reshape) the panorama of not simply “city sq.” discourse however house journey, synthetic intelligence (AI), transportation and even politics. He operates on a scale incompatible with endgames. I sense the X rebrand is extra a few course of journey. Or perhaps a sacrifice for a higher purpose.
The X rebrand may relate to AI (Musk had a task in a information drought this 12 months by limiting Twitter information entry). Or it could possibly be testing the waters for a distinct pivot later within the 12 months. Or it could possibly be an try and distract from another transfer. There’s no option to know.
Even the phrase “time will inform” isn’t any assist. How can we all know if an unknown plan succeeds or not? Does Musk care if Twitter disappears? Does he care if he’s value 200 billion or 300 billion?
Welcome to the inscrutable world of X.